AAIMCo is a non-profit trade association comprised of insurance and risk professionals who provide fee-based consulting and educational services to their clients.
The Professional Members of AAIMCo are among the most knowledgeable and highly sought after, fee-based consultants, experts and educators in the insurance and risk management fields. Their clients include insurance agencies and associations, multi-national insurance companies, corporations and attorneys for services ranging from consulting and expert witness to education and training.
AAIMCo’s purpose is to provide an insurance and risk forum for professionals of the highest caliber to share ideas and exchange information for the betterment of our professions. AAIMCo also strives to set the highest professional standards for our members and our industries and will publish official position papers in support of that goal.
Nationally Recognized
Authoritative Publication of AAIMCo
"Agency/Brokerage Valuation Guide"
(Download a free copy)
Membership News
Featured Consultants
Featured Library Publications
What The Attorney Hired By The Insurance Company Is Not
Corporate Counsel is not properly the attorney to specifically respond for the Insurance Company to a suit against the Insurance Company.
Continuity and prior/pending litigation exclusions in the claims-made policy form
“Directors and officers liability policies have long been issued on a “pure claims-made” basis (a phrase this writer first coined in 1990). That is, they were written with no prior act date (also known as a retroactive date). As a result, wrongful acts of the directors and officers dating back to corporate formation were covered as long as the claim – …
Competition Commoditization Vs. Differentiation Which Will Prevail? It Depends On You!
Do you want to be different than your competitors or do you want to sell a commodity? Click here to see the difference and how competition can be healthy for you.
Forensic Litigation Consultant Professional Liability
This article appeared in the Forensic Expert Witness Association Newsletter for the First Quarter of 2012.
IT’S FUNDAMENTAL: The Duty to Defend – The Anomaly of D.R. Horton-Tex., Ltd. v. Markel Inter’l Ins. Co
Is it possible to have a duty to indemnify but not a corresponding duty to defend? Is the duty to indemnify without a corresponding duty to defend an anomaly, or at least a bit illogical? Or is it perfectly logical in the context of an “eight-corners” state, like Texas?
